JUDGMENTS

Petition No. 19 of 2025

[(i). The Petitioner has not demonstrated the necessity or expediency required under s42 of the Probate and  Administration  Act; (ii). The undertaking in force provides adequate protection of the disputed assets pending the determination of Originating Summons no.13 of 2023. The Court may direct that it be reinforced by a statutory declaration by the 1st Respondent; (iii). The appointment of an administrator pendente lite would be unnecessary and disproportionate; (iv). The Petition is dismissed; and (v).  Costs to the Respondent, to be taxed if not agreed]

Decision date: 17 Dec 2025
Criminal Trial No. 28 of 2023

[Criminal law – Judgment – 3 charges – publishing seditious posts on Facebook – seditious intent – excite disaffection against His Majesty the Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan or Government or judicial administrations – offense under section 4(1)(c) of the Sedition Act, Cap 24, read with sections 3(1)(a) and 3(1)(c) of the same – trial]

Decision date: 6 Dec 2025

Criminal Trial No. 17 of 2019

[Criminal law — Sentencing — Voluntarily causing hurt — Use of weapon — Unprovoked attack — Serious injuries — Theft reduced to dishonest misappropriation — Possession of stolen vehicle — First offender — Remorse — Mitigation — Limited weight

Sentencing — Consecutive sentences — Totality principle — Backdating of sentence — Time in remand — Effective sentence fully served

Sentencing — Whipping — Statutory prohibition — Accused sentenced to death — Criminal Procedure Code s.258(b)]

Decision date: 3 Dec 2025

Civil Appeal No. 19 of 2024

[Civil Law. Appeal against Judge’s Order granting Respondent relief, including an Order for sale, in respect of a Memorandum of Charge on each of two separate parcels of land and Units built on land entered into to secure Trade Line Facilities for company, Panahome, dismissed with costs. Action arose from failure of Panahome to repay monies owed from use of those facilities. Appellant’s deposit with Court of BND 1000 as security for appeal released to Respondent in part-payment of costs]

Decision date: 19 Nov 2025

Civil Appeal No. 7 of 2024

[Civil: costs of trial; A. awarded damages against Rs for personal injuries but A. 30% contributorily negligent.; Judge ordered costs to A.; O. 59, r. 3(2), RSC-Court’s power to order that part of the costs should not follow the event. Court ordered discount of 10% from Order of costs to Rs for increased costs of trial of contested contributory negligence.
Order: Rs to pay A. 90% of A’s costs]

Decision date: 19 Nov 2025
Criminal Trial No. 12 of 2025

[Criminal Law – Bail – Murder charge under Section 302 Penal Code (Cap 22) – Death penalty – Application for bail pending investigation – Gravity of offence – strength of case – likelihood of interference with witnesses – balance of probabilities that bail should not be granted – Bail refused – Application dismissed]

Decision date: 15 Nov 2025

Criminal Trial No. 2 Of 2025

[Criminal Law – Sentencing – Human Trafficking – Section 4 of the Trafficking and Smuggling of Persons Order 2004 – Section 5(1) of the Anti-Trafficking in Person Act, CAP 230– plead guilty before trial commence – minimum sentence afforded]

Public Prosecutor v Mahedi Hassan

HCCT/2/2025

Decision date: 6 Nov 2025

Civil Appeal No. 1 of 2025

  • [Civil. Law Society’s appeal from decision of Acting Chief Justice admitting R. as an Advocate and Solicitor in Brunei Darussalam dismissed. R a person who is neither a citizen of nor a permanent resident in Brunei Darussalam. No order for costs.
  • Meaning of “qualified person” within ss.3 and following of the Legal Profession Act, CAP 132 (“the LPA”), together with the requirement of being in “active practice” in the UK “for at least 7 years immediately preceding” the application.
  • Consideration of requirement of “good character” in ss. 4(b) and 5 of the LPA and duty of candour on applicant.
  • Role of Law Society: gravity of an allegation calling into question a professional’s good character or alleging a want of candour.
  • In the generality of cases, the correct approach in Brunei Darussalam is to welcome those who have the expertise and experience to contribute to the practice of law in Brunei Darussalam and the development of this jurisdiction, subject, always, to insistence on the requisite standards, namely: that applicant is a qualified person and of good
    character. Touchstone throughout is the public interest. Task is to balance benefits to the public interest of Brunei Darussalam in admitting such foreign practitioners while maintaining requisite standards.
  • Inherent jurisdiction: Order framed to deal with applicant’s withdrawal of Petition and stated intention of not returning to Brunei Darussalam]

COACV/1/2025

Decision date: 1 Nov 2025

Civil Appeal No. 18 of 2024

[Civil Procedure: Appeal dismissed. Following automatic discontinuance of action, pursuant to O. 21, r. 2 (6), Appellant’s application for leave for reinstatement, pursuant to O. 21, r. 2 (10) refused by Registrar; appeal dismissed by Judge. Three-limb test for reinstatement applied: test stipulated in Singapore in Moguntia-Est, adopted in Brunei
Darussalam and explained in Maxwell, approved by Court of Appeal in Hafiz]

Decision date: 28 Oct 2025

Originating Summons No. 30 Of 2025

[Civil Procedure – Transfer of proceedings – Magistrate’s Court to Intermediate Court – Section 25(3)(g) Subordinate Courts Act – Absence of Rules of Court – Supervisory jurisdiction – Inherent powers – Whether High Court may order transfer – Counterclaim exceeding jurisdictional limit – Distinct causes of action – Application dismissed. ]

Decision date: 22 Oct 2025

About GOV.BN  |  Research Us   |  Rate this Website

Digital Services

Overview of Digital Government

Digital Government Strategy & Initiatives

Digital Government Strategic Plans & Legislation

Other Information

Circular & Policy

Tenders & Quotations

TPOR for Government Agencies

Privacy Statement  |  Terms of Use  |  Disclaimer

Copyright Goverment of Brunei Darussalam. All Right Reserved.