JUDGMENTS

Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2022

[sentence-application for leave to appeal out of time allowed; sentence of 8 years’ imprisonment, following a plea of guilty to an offence of mischief by fire, intending to cause damage or knowing it likely to be caused quashed; in its place, a sentence of 6 years and 8 months’ imprisonment imposed; no other orders. Total resulting sentence-7 years and 8 months’ imprisonment and 6 strokes]

Decision date: 22 Nov 2022
Criminal Motion No. 3 of 2022

[sentence – Libut’s appeal allowed in one respect only. Judge’s order that the effective date of sentence be the date of sentence, quashed; order made that the effective date of sentence was to run from the date the appellant was remanded in custody by an order made under the Criminal Law Preventive Detention Order. Sofian application for leave to appeal out of time dismissed]

Decision date: 22 Nov 2022
Criminal Appeal No. 9 of 2021

[sentence-appeal allowed; gang robbery, contrary to s. 395 and s. 398, Penal Code and housebreaking at night, s. 457; appellant’s evidence for the prosecution accepted at trial of a co-accused who was sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment; 50% discount from starting points; 8 years’ imprisonment and 12 strokes, reduced to 6 years’ imprisonment and 12 strokes]

Decision date: 19 Nov 2022

Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 2021

[sentence, causing death of 5-month-old daughter (s.304(1) Penal Code) 15 yeas; causing GBH (s. 325-10 years and 2 strokes); failing to report to police (s. 176)-2 months. Total sentence: 20 years and 2 strokes. Appeal dismissed. Imposition of maximum sentence- within band of the worst type of case. No discount for pleas of guilty for s. 304 (1) and s. 325 offences- need to protect society and reflect public abhorrence. PP’s appeal against order of 2 strokes only dismissed- within judge’s discretion]

Decision date: 19 Nov 2022

Criminal Appeal No. 10 of 2021

[sentence, causing death of 5-month-old daughter (s.304(1) Penal Code) 15 yeas; causing GBH (s. 325-10 years and 2 strokes); failing to report to police (s. 176)-2 months. Total sentence: 20 years and 2 strokes. Appeal dismissed. Imposition of maximum sentence- within band of the worst type of case. No discount for pleas of guilty for s. 304 (1) and s. 325 offences- need to protect society and reflect public abhorrence. PP’s appeal against order of 2 strokes only dismissed- within judge’s discretion]

Decision date: 19 Nov 2022

Criminal Appeal No. 9 of 2021

[sentence-appeal allowed; gang robbery, contrary to s. 395 and s. 398, Penal Code and housebreaking at night, s. 457; appellant’s evidence for the prosecution accepted at trial of a co-accused who was sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment; 50% discount from starting points; 8 years’ imprisonment and 12 strokes, reduced to 6 years’ imprisonment and 12 strokes]

Decision date: 19 Nov 2022

Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 2021

[Conviction: appeal dismissed; 3 charges s. 409 Penal Code-criminal breach of trust dishonest misappropriation, $17,400 of cash bail bond monies over 2 ½ years by Inspector of RBPF; repeatedly failed to hand over monies; handed over only $3,900 at the end; balance of $13,500 unaccounted for. Judge entitled to draw adverse inferences.

Sentence: total of 4 years’ imprisonment entirely appropriate; aggravating factorsabuse of position and authority over 2 ½ years-undermined public confidence in the integrity of RBPF; significant loss. Compensation order of $13,900 in favour of RBPFentirely proper. Appeal dismissed.]

Decision date: 12 Nov 2022

Originating Summons No. 34 of 2020

[Appeal to Judge in Chambers – both parties – against the decision of the Deputy Chief Registrar – to disallow Plaintiff application to disclose the identity of the person who had drawn or prepare on the Defendant’s behalf in relation to HCCS No. 36 of 2017 – Defendant – appeal decision to disallow counterclaim – whether in nature of judicial review – whether prohibited by Article 84C of the Constitution]

Date of Decision: 3 Oct 2022

Criminal Trial No. 10 of 2022

[Criminal law – 2 charges of rape of a girl under 14 years old under section 376(2)(b) – Penal Code – pleaded guilty to both charges – sentence of 16 years and 12 strokes of whipping]

Public Prosecutor v Mohammad Eddy Hazman bin Haji Sulaiman

HCCT/10/2022

Decision date: 1 Oct 2022

Civil Suit No. 10 of 2018

[Civil Procedure – Tenancy Agreement – 1st and 2nd Defendant as an agent of principal which did not exist – no distinction or separation between D1 and D2 and the company – lifting the coporate veil – claim dismissed.]

Decision date: 19 Sep 2022

About GOV.BN  |  Research Us   |  Rate this Website

Digital Services

Overview of Digital Government

Digital Government Strategy & Initiatives

Digital Government Strategic Plans & Legislation

Other Information

Circular & Policy

Tenders & Quotations

TPOR for Government Agencies

Privacy Statement  |  Terms of Use  |  Disclaimer

Copyright Goverment of Brunei Darussalam. All Right Reserved.