JUDGMENTS

Criminal Appeal No. 18 of 2007

[Isolated offence of robbery under sections 390 and 392 of the Penal Code. Sentence of 6 years and 12 strokes imposed after plea held to be manifestly excessive. Starting point of 6 years reduced to 3 years and 6 months imprisonment for the plea and other mitigating factors substituted. Proper approach on sentence to previous convictions discussed]

Mohd Rafee Bin Jublee v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

COACM/18/2007

Decision date: 2 Nov 2009
Civil Appeal No. 28 of 2008

[Prohibitory order discharged. The court’s substantive power to order the seizure of land is to be found in Sections 17 to 20 of the Debtors Act Cap.195. A judgment debtor seeking a prohibitory order proceeding under O.47 r.6 of the RSC must satisfy these provisions of the Debtors Act. ]

Lee Fat Khong, Lee Fatt Shoon v Baiduri Bank Berhad

COACV/28/2008

Decision date: 3 June 2009
Civil Appeal No. 17 of 2008

[Contracts of employment in Brunei Darussalam have an implied term of mutual trust and confidence. In dismissing the plaintiff after 20 years service for poor performance his employer, the bank, was in breach. The bank held liable for wrongful dismissal. ]

Loh Nyuk Choi v Standard Chartered Finance (Brunei) Berhad

COACV/17/2008

Decision date: 2 June 2009
Civil Appeal No. 21 of 2008

[Enforceability of an agreement recorded by court but not part of any order – Does res judicata apply to an issue which arises after commencement of an action which was not then pursued in the action.]

Hytec Engineering Co. Sdn Bhd, Ak Saifuzzaman Pg Hj Md Yassin, Tan Biew Peng, Lim Beng Kwang v Baiduri Bank Berhad

COACV/21/2008

Decision date: 23 May 2009
Civil Appeal No. 20 of 2008

[Enforceability of an agreement recorded by court but not part of any order – Does res judicata apply to an issue which arises after commencement of an action which was not then pursued in the action.]

Liaw Watt Lee, Tan Biew Peng v Baiduri Bank Berhad

COACV/20/2008

Decision date: 23 May 2009
Civil Appeal No. 19 of 2008

[Appeal against costs order allowed. Application of 0.22A – Payment into court.]

Koperasi Kampung Keriam Dengan Tanggungan Berhad, Insol Anak Gaing v Taty Tjhai (suing as the administrator of the estate of CHANDRAWATI TJHAIM deceased)

COACV/19/2008

Decision date: 23 May 2009
Civil Appeal No. 1 of 2009

[A certified copy of the Senior Magistrate’s decision was not annexed to the notice of appeal to the judge. The appeal was not properly constituted but the Judge wrongly refused to hear the appellants’ application for extension of time. Court of Appeal refused appellants’ application for an extension of time as his prospects of success are minimal and dismissed the appeal. ]

Yap Fook Hoo (trading as Yapp Fook Hoo Transport Company & Fook Hoo Builder Sand Filling Contractor) v Lau Yun Company

COACV/1/2009

Decision date: 18 May 2009
Civil Appeal No. 1 of 2009

[18th May, 2009.
A certified copy of the Senior Magistrate’s decision was not annexed to the notice of appeal to the judge. The appeal was not properly constituted but the Judge wrongly refused to hear the appellants’ application for extension of time. Court of Appeal refused appellants’ application for an extension of time as his prospects of success are minimal and dismissed the appeal.]

Yap Fook Hoo (trading as Yapp Fook Hoo Transport Company & Fook Hoo Builder Sand Filling Contractor) v Lau Yun Company

COACV/1/2009

Decision date: 18 May 2009
Civil Appeal No. 15 of 2008

[Equity – assignment of future income made for consideration – income payable under future contracts – effect of bankruptcy of assignor.]

Baiduri Bank Berhad v The Official Receiver (the Trustee for the Property of Kumariah Bte Hj Sirat, a Bankrupt)

COACV/15/2008

Decision date: 16 May 2009
Civil Appeal No. 22 of 2009

[Judge’s interlocutory decision in plaintiffs’ favour on liability only. Leave to appeal necessary but leave not applied for at the appropriate time. Leave to appeal and leave to apply out or time granted on the appellants’ undertaking to pay the costs of any further appeal in the action. Appeal against liability and contributory negligence dismissed with costs. ]

Faridah Binti Hj Abd Hamid, Rozini Bin Hamdan v Azman Bin Amran, Nadirahtul Elmi Binti Amran (through her father and next friend), Amran Bin Hj Aji, Sidup Bin Burut

COACV/22/2009

Decision date: 7 May 2009
Civil Appeal No. 9 of 2008

[Leave to appeal – whether judgment final or interlocutory – meaning of final – principles applicable to leave. Summary judgment – principles applicable. Syariah law – relevance to financial facility. Whether summary judgment should be granted for money sum. Leave to amend the defence in reliance on section 75 of the Contracts Act. Whether summary judgment should be granted for declaration and amount to be assessed.]

Morsima Sdn Bhd, Wong Yep Meng v Perbadanan Tabung Amanah Islam Brunei

COACV/9/2008

Decision date: 27 Nov 2008
Criminal Appeal No. 6 of 2006

[Possession of controlled drugs for the purpose of trafficking. Failure to give full
consideration to defence evidence. Failure to allow prosecution witnesses to be
recalled for cross-examination as to credit. Conviction unsafe. Conviction
quashed]

Hj Mohd Seriwan Bin Hj Sulaiman v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

COACM/6/2006

Decision date: 25 Nov 2008
Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 2008

[Mr Sheikh Noordin Bin Seikh Mohammad of Messrs. Sheikh Noordin Mohammad for the Appellant. DPP Hjh Anifa Rafiza Bte Hj Abdul Ghani standing in for DPP Hjh Suriana Radin for
the Public Prosecutor/Respondent]

Rosli Bin Tuah v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

COACM/4/2008

Decision date: 24 Nov 2008
Civil Appeal No. 23 of 2008

[Application for leave to appeal to Court of Appeal against order of judge adjournment an appeal from a Registrar. Approach of Court of Appeal to interference with a discretionary order.]

Awangku Muhammad Mursyid Bin Pg Hj Ali, Pg Ali Bin Pg Maon v Makrami Bin Hj Md Noor

COACV/23/2008

Decision date: 24 Nov 2008
Civil Appeal No. 13 of 2008

[Appeal against the Judge’s decision to refuse to make a garnishee order absolute. Not in dispute that the necessary facts for this debt of the judgment debtor to be attached are established. The judge’s approach in making his own decision on the evidence he heard is correct. A garnishee order absolute is discretionary. Judge exercised his discretion but his reasons were flawed. The court of appeal exercised the judge’s discretion anew and ordered the garnishee order to be made absolute. ]

Baiduri Bank Berhad v L & L Engineering Corporation Sdn Bhd

COACV/13/2008

Decision date: 24 Nov 2008
Criminal Appeal No. 6 of 2006

[Possession of controlled drugs for the purpose of trafficking. Failure to give full
consideration to defence evidence. Failure to allow prosecution witnesses to be
recalled for cross-examination as to credit. Conviction unsafe. Conviction
quashed]

Hj Mohd Seriwan Bin Hj Sulaiman v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

COACM/6/2006

Decision date: 24 Nov 2008
Civil Appeal No. 15 of 2007

[Civil appeal. Fatal accidents claim. The deceased cyclist riding erratically in same direction as the car driven by the defendant. Driver sounded horn to warn cyclist of his approach. Cyclist pulled in towards his nearside. When the driver was passing him he suddenly and without signal or warning rode to his right into the path of the car. The judge’s decision that the accident was entirely the fault of the cyclist upheld on appeal. The decision of the judge purely a question of fact]

Carmelina J. Vasquez (as administrator of Dennis Veluz Landicha) v Mohd Alit Abd Rahman Bin Hj Mohd Jaafar & Anor

COACV/15/2007

Decision date: 22 Nov 2008

About GOV.BN  |  Research Us   |  Rate this Website

Digital Services

Overview of Digital Government

Digital Government Strategy & Initiatives

Digital Government Strategic Plans & Legislation

Other Information

Circular & Policy

Tenders & Quotations

TPOR for Government Agencies

Privacy Statement  |  Terms of Use  |  Disclaimer

Copyright Goverment of Brunei Darussalam. All Right Reserved.