JUDGMENTS

Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 2019

[Criminal Law — Police involved — voluntarily causing hurt — contrary to section 323 of the Penal Code, Cap 22 — Notice of Motion — leave to appeal against D1’s conviction — Notice of Appeal — for sentence to be enhanced for deterrent purposes – appropriate sentence]

Decision date: 10 Feb 2020
Criminal Trial No. 11 of 2018

[Stay of criminal proceedings – general principles to be followed, Amendments to legislation not to apply retrospectively]

Public Prosecutor v Ramzidah binti Pehin Datu Kesuma Diraja Kol (R) Hj Abdul Rahman (1st Defendant)& Hj Nabil Daraina bin Pehin Udana Khatib Dato Paduka Seri Setia Ustaz Hj Awang Badaruddin (2nd Defendant)

HCCT/11/2018

Decision date: 20 Jan 2020
Criminal Trial No. 11 of 2018

[Criminal Breach of Trust: section 405 of the Penal Code, Cap 22. Money laundering: section 3(1) of the Criminal Asset Recovery Order 2012, Common Intention: section 34 of the Penal Code, Cap.22.]

Public Prosecutor v Ramzidah binti Pehin Datu Kesuma DirajaKol (R) Hj Abdul Rahman (1st Defendant) & Hj Nabil Daraina bin Pehin Udana Khatib Dato Paduka Seri Setia Ustaz Hj Awang Badaruddin (2nd Defendant)

HCCT/11/2018

Decision date: 15 Jan 2020
Criminal Appeal No. 8 of 2019

[Appeal allowed; the court quashed the judge’s orders that, on his pleas of guilty, the appellant receive three strokes for each of three offences contrary to s. 457 of the Penal Code, to a total of six strokes, and that the sentences of imprisonment commence on the date of sentencing and imposed two strokes for each offence, ordering that they be non-cumulative, and that the sentences of imprisonment commence on the date when the appellant was first remanded in custody, notwithstanding that after a month he had been detained under a Detention Order pursuant to the Criminal Law (Preventive Detention) Act, Cap. 150.]

Decision date: 26 Nov 2019
Criminal Appeal No. 14 of 2019

[Validity of guilty plea – Whether accused understood the nature and consequences of his plea – Whether guilty plea qualified by statement of accused in mitigation – section 175 of Criminal Procedure Code.

Making incorrect declaration – Absolute offence – Absence of knowledge of accused of falsity or incorrectness of untrue or incorrect declaration made no defence – sections 138(1)(b) and 138(2)(a) of Customs Order 2006.]

Decision date: 25 Nov 2019
Criminal Appeal No. 16 of 2019

[An appeal against a sentence of 1½ years imprisonment and one stroke, imposed following the appellant’s conviction after trial of an offence of housebreaking of domestic premises at night, contrary to s.457 of the Penal Code, was dismissed. The judge was unduly lenient in imposing a sentence of 1½ years imprisonment, together with one stroke, having regard to the “inordinate delay” of more than 6 years since the commission of the offence]

Decision date: 21 Nov 2019
Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 2019

[An appeal against a total sentence of 6 years’ imprisonment and 4 strokes imposed on the appellant father, on his pleas of guilty, to 4 charges of assaulting one daughter in an overall period of about five years, contrary to s. 354 B, when she was aged between 12 and 17 years, and two charges of assaulting another daughter, when she was aged 9 and 17 years respectively, contrary to S. 354 of the Penal Code, Cap. 22 was dismissed.]

Decision date: 19 Nov 2019

About GOV.BN  |  Research Us   |  Rate this Website

Digital Services

Overview of Digital Government

Digital Government Strategy & Initiatives

Digital Government Strategic Plans & Legislation

Other Information

Circular & Policy

Tenders & Quotations

TPOR for Government Agencies

Privacy Statement  |  Terms of Use  |  Disclaimer

Copyright Goverment of Brunei Darussalam. All Right Reserved.