JUDGMENTS
Criminal Motion No. 15 of 2024
[Criminal law – Possession and distribution of obscene photographs – Use of criminal force with intent to outrage modesty – Victim aged 15 – Sentence. ]
Decision date: 10 Nov 2025
Criminal Trial No. 46 of 2025
[Criminal law – sentence- theft of property- section 454 of the Penal Code- commit house-breaking-section- section 379 of the Penal Code- did commit theft- section 447 of the Penal Code- commit trespass- deterrent sentence]
Decision date: 10 Nov 2025
Civil Suit No 39 of 2021
[Application for leave to appeal interlocutory order for amendment of pleadings – principles to be applied – whether limitation period applies to the claim made – whether cause of action shown.]
Decision date: 8 Nov 2025
Civil Suit No. 24 of 2023
[Appeal from decision under Order 14A – application of non-binding term – whether evidence of implied contract overriding it – locus standi of directors acting for company.]
Decision date: 8 Nov 2025
Criminal Trial No. 2 Of 2025
[Criminal Law – Sentencing – Human Trafficking – Section 4 of the Trafficking and Smuggling of Persons Order 2004 – Section 5(1) of the Anti-Trafficking in Person Act, CAP 230– plead guilty before trial commence – minimum sentence afforded]
Public Prosecutor v Mahedi Hassan
HCCT/2/2025
Decision date: 6 Nov 2025
Civil Appeal No. 1 of 2025
- [Civil. Law Society’s appeal from decision of Acting Chief Justice admitting R. as an Advocate and Solicitor in Brunei Darussalam dismissed. R a person who is neither a citizen of nor a permanent resident in Brunei Darussalam. No order for costs.
- Meaning of “qualified person” within ss.3 and following of the Legal Profession Act, CAP 132 (“the LPA”), together with the requirement of being in “active practice” in the UK “for at least 7 years immediately preceding” the application.
- Consideration of requirement of “good character” in ss. 4(b) and 5 of the LPA and duty of candour on applicant.
- Role of Law Society: gravity of an allegation calling into question a professional’s good character or alleging a want of candour.
- In the generality of cases, the correct approach in Brunei Darussalam is to welcome those who have the expertise and experience to contribute to the practice of law in Brunei Darussalam and the development of this jurisdiction, subject, always, to insistence on the requisite standards, namely: that applicant is a qualified person and of good
character. Touchstone throughout is the public interest. Task is to balance benefits to the public interest of Brunei Darussalam in admitting such foreign practitioners while maintaining requisite standards. - Inherent jurisdiction: Order framed to deal with applicant’s withdrawal of Petition and stated intention of not returning to Brunei Darussalam]
COACV/1/2025
Decision date: 1 Nov 2025
Civil Appeal No. 18 of 2024
[Civil Procedure: Appeal dismissed. Following automatic discontinuance of action, pursuant to O. 21, r. 2 (6), Appellant’s application for leave for reinstatement, pursuant to O. 21, r. 2 (10) refused by Registrar; appeal dismissed by Judge. Three-limb test for reinstatement applied: test stipulated in Singapore in Moguntia-Est, adopted in Brunei
Darussalam and explained in Maxwell, approved by Court of Appeal in Hafiz]
Decision date: 28 Oct 2025
Civil Suit No. 117 of 2019
[Claim for loss in investment funds – whether made following misrepresentation – whether representations relied on by Plaintiff – question of liability of person making investments – validity of acknowledgement of debt – whether claim time barred ]
Decision date: 27 Oct 2025
Civil Appeal No. 19 of 2024
Originating Summons No. 30 Of 2025
[Civil Procedure – Transfer of proceedings – Magistrate’s Court to Intermediate Court – Section 25(3)(g) Subordinate Courts Act – Absence of Rules of Court – Supervisory jurisdiction – Inherent powers – Whether High Court may order transfer – Counterclaim exceeding jurisdictional limit – Distinct causes of action – Application dismissed. ]
Decision date: 22 Oct 2025
Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 2025
[Criminal Law – Prevention of Corruption Act, Cap 131 and Penal Code, Cap. 22 – Appeal by Prosecution against acquittal on all charges – Failure of a Magistrate to determine if defendants have rebutted presumption under Section 25 of Prevention of Corruption Act – Magistrate to assess evidence in totality based on objective standard – Appeal allowed – Retrial ordered]
Decision date: 22 Oct 2025
Civil Suit No. 5 of 2025
[Application for leave to appeal – debtor the subject of a receiving order wishing to review taxation of costs – whether leave of Official Receiver required – whether certificate of costs final upon being admitted as a debt – jurisdiction of court]
Decision date: 21 Oct 2025
Criminal Trial No. 4 Of 2024
[Sentencing – Rape – Section 376(2)(b) Penal Code – Conviction after trial – No remorse – Victim aged 8 – Tender years – Exemption from whipping, defendant over 50 years old – Section 258 Criminal Procedure Code – Additional imprisonment in lieu of whipping – Deterrence, denunciation and protection of children]
Public Prosecutor v S Bin T
HCCT/4/2024
Decision date: 18 Oct 2025
Civil Suit No. 30 Of 2023
[Civil Procedure — Interlocutory applications — Payment into court — Whether defect in summons fatal or curable under O.2 r.1 and O.86 r.4 — Scope of O.29 r.2(3) — Application at post-judgment stage — Outstanding costs and pending appeal — Whether sufficient to constitute “dispute over a specific fund” — Jurisdiction. ]
Decision date: 9 Oct 2025
Civil Appeal No. 7 of 2024
[Civil Procedure-Costs: (i) Trial-Order 22A, r. 9 (3) of Rules of Supreme Court, Cap. 5 not applicable-only offer to settle proceedings was from 2nd R. for BND 85,000; judgment for A. for BND 124,529.92, with interest and costs, more favourable than terms of offer; 1st/2nd Rs to pay A.’s costs on standard basis, to be taxed, if not agreed, subject to determination of 2nd R. ‘s claim for discount of costs- relevance of J. ‘s contested finding of A’s contributory negligence/rejection of some heads of claim; DIrections: parties to file submissions in 7 days.
(ii) Court of Appeal- A ‘s appeal dismissed; A. to pay 1st/2nd Rs’ costs on standard basis, to be taxed if not agreed]
Decision date: 8 Oct 2025
Criminal Trial No. 3 of 2022
[Criminal Law – Sentencing – Human Trafficking – Section 4 of the Trafficking and Smuggling of Persons Order 2004 – six Bangladeshi victims recruited by deception – plead guilty during trial after 4 out of 6 victims have given evidence – 1/3 discount in sentencing not afforded – multiple aggravating factors outweigh late guilty plea – sentence of 7 years 6 months’ imprisonment, fine $120,000 and 4 strokes imposed]
Decision date: 2 Oct 2025
Criminal Appeal No. 13 of 2025
[Criminal law – Bail –Appeal against Magistrate Decision – Evidence in its entirety – Appeal Allowed – Magistrate Decision set aside]
Decision date: 2 Oct 2025
Originating Motion No. 3 of 2025
Civil. Renewed application for leave to appeal allowed: Judge’s dismissal of Registrar’s refusal to strike out Respondent’s claim, O.18, r. (1), RSC on grounds what it disclosed no reasonable cause of action, was scandalous, frivolous or vexatious or otherwise an abuse of the process of the Court; and O.14 A, RSC as a matter of a question of law and/or construction of documents. Respondent’s claim for liquidated damages for delay in delivery of Units by Applicant on practical completion in Development Agreement. Issue arising of effect of Project Architect’s unparticularised certification of an extension of time for practical completion of 125 days, on application of Applicant on several different grounds including a Stop-Work Order issued by Authorities because site was not safe, having regard to Clause 2.7 that such certification, “…shall be construed and relied upon as valid and any such certification shall be final, conclusive and binding on the parties hereto.” No issue as to fraud or dishonesty in the issue of certificate. Narrowness of defence of “manifest error”. Sara Hossein Assets Holdings Ltd. v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd. [2023] UKSC 2, at paragraphs 30-34]
Decision date: 29 Oct 2025
Companies Winding Up No. 4 of 2025
[ Arbitration – Stay of proceedings – International Arbitration Act, s 6 – Prima facie standard – Tomolugen three-stage test – Valid arbitration agreement – Dispute within scope – Agreement inoperative or incapable of being performed – Non-payment of deposit – Refund request – Resignation of arbitrator – Prolonged inactivity – Just and equitable winding-up – Public policy – Balance of prejudice – Stay refused. ]
SUTERA ENERGY SDN BHD v APPSMITHS SUTERA SDN BHD, APPSMITHS SDN BHD
BCY/4/2025
Decision date: 30 Sep 2025
Criminal Trial No. 9 of 2025
[Bail – Defendant application for bail – charge of rape by a person of trust or
authority – Section 376(2)(c) Penal Code – prosecution objecting to bail – risk of
Defendant tampering with prosecution witness/complainant – bail denied]
Public Prosecutor v Haji Warithu Bin Haji
HCCT/9/2025
Decision date: 20 Sep 2025
Civil Appeal No. 17 of 2024
[Civil- Procedure: (i) O.21, r.2(6) automatic discontinuance rule; and (ii) O.21, r.2(10) discretionary power to reinstate action. Appellant/Plaintiff’s appeal dismissed with costs, to be taxed if not agreed; lower Court’s orders on costs upheld.
June 2013-Road Traffic Accident causing personal injuries; March 2016 – action set down for trial; December 2017 – early trial dates sought (not trial ready.)
Automatic discontinuance rule: initially developed in English law, adopted in Singapore and applied in Brunei – Moguntia-Est Epices SA v Sea-Hawk Freight Pte Ltd [2003] 4 SLR(R) 429 and Malayan Banking Berhad v Maxwell Co. Sdn Bhd & Anor [Civil Suit No. 107 of 2005]; applied case management philosophy – promoting despatch, expedition and efficiency and countering inexcusable delay in litigation;
• rule not rendered inapplicable merely because action set down for trial;
• Practice Direction No. 3 of 2015- trial dates only allocated once all pre-trial issues resolved;
• though incumbent on Court to set trial dates, parties not absolved from duty to do what they can to progress the litigation;
• if rule applied, action automatically discontinued.
Discretionary power to reinstate action- O.21, r.2(10)
• Reinstatement- exception not the rule – three limbs to be satisfied, cumulatively; Court of Appeal will not lightly interfere with exercise of case management discretion by Registrar or Judge.
Summary of principles: automatic discontinuance rule and exercise of discretion to reinstate action automatically discontinued.
Application: (i) automatic discontinuance rule, O.21, r.2(6) if applicable, trigger date was 4 August 2018, with guillotine date 3 August 2019; rule remained applicable and action automatically discontinued.
(ii) discretionary power to reinstate action, O.21, r.2(10)
Court of Appeal declined to interfere with discretionary decisions of Registrar and Judge refusing to reinstate action – although agreeing with the Registrar, and reversing the Judge, that first limb of Moguntia was satisfied; Appellant failed to satisfy second limb of Moguntia.]
Decision date: 2 Sep 2025
Criminal Trial No. 4 of 2024
[Rape – Child under 14 – Partial penetration sufficient – Child witness – Unsworn evidence – Section 133A Evidence Act – Corroboration – Complaint to mother – Section 157 Evidence Act – Medical evidence – Redness at vaginal entrance – No hymenal tear – No semen – Credibility of complainant – Conduct of accused – Apology when confronted – Defence of denial and alibi – Alibi not made out – Burden of proof – Prosecution case proven beyond reasonable doubt]
Decision date: 2 Sep 2025
Criminal Motion No. 4 Of 2024
[Criminal Procedure – Bail – Appeal against refusal – Application filed out of time – Delay of 107 days – Ignorance of law not a satisfactory explanation – Merits of appeal considered – Multiple serious charges – Strong prosecution case – High risk of reoffending and absconding – Personal hardship not exceptional – Trial near conclusion – Appeal dismissed – Bail refused]
Public Prosecutor v Hillery Roy Anak Taip
CM/4/2024
Decision date: 26 Aug 2025
Criminal Motion No. 15 of 2025
[Criminal Law – Road Traffic Offence – Driving without insurance – Section 3(1) & (2) Motor Vehicle Insurance (Third Party Risks) Act, Cap. 90 – Mandatory disqualification – Appeal for reduction – “Special reasons” – Meaning – Whether financial hardship and employment consequences constitute special reason – Negligence in failing to renew insurance – No evidence of actual job loss – Hardship personal to offender – Disqualification upheld – Appeal dismissed]
ALJAZAIR AL-HAJ BIN JUNAIDI v Public Prosecutor
HACM/15/2025
Decision date: 26 Aug 2025
Criminal Trial No. 14 of 2023
[Criminal Law – sentencing – Section 28(1)(a) Children and Younger Person Act (CYPA) – newborn child punched and dropped – left on floor for a day – resulting in its death – plea of guilty – starting point of 6 years imprisonment]
Public Prosecutor v Nurul Fitria Arnas
HCCT/14/2023
Decision date: 25 Aug 2025
About GOV.BN | Research Us | Rate this Website
Digital Services
Overview of Digital Government
Digital Government Strategy & Initiatives
Digital Government Strategic Plans & Legislation
Other Information
Circular & Policy
Tenders & Quotations
TPOR for Government Agencies
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Disclaimer
Copyright Goverment of Brunei Darussalam. All Right Reserved.
